Radlager hinten | Porsche 964 1989 – 1994 | OEM

Radlager hinten | Porsche 964 1989 – 1994 | OEM

Marsoni

M251S

$62.95

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Radlager hinten | Porsche 964 1989 – 1994 | OEMRadlager hinten OEM Erstausrsterqualitt Porsche 964 C2 C4 RS (Standardkarosserie) Radlager hinten in OEM Erstausrsterqualitt. Hinweis: Fr Fahrzeuge mit werkseitig breiter Karosserie (Turbo Look) oder Turbomodelle bitte Teilenummer 99905305502 verwenden. Radmutter wird beim Einbau zum Einmalartikel Austausch wird empfohlen. Porsche 964 C2 (Standardkarosserie) Porsche 964 C4 (Standardkarosserie) Porsche 964 RS Bei Fragen stehen wir jederzeit gerne zur

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Radlager hinten | Porsche 964 1989 – 1994 | OEM orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Radlager hinten | Porsche 964 1989 – 1994 | OEM ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Radlager hinten | Porsche 964 1989 – 1994 | OEM, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Radlager hinten | Porsche 964 1989 – 1994 | OEM in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I hoped to return this room divider but learned too late it doesn't have free returns. I bought this and another one that didn't have the solid wood on the bottom and had smaller rectangular wooden lattice. The other one looks great. On this one, the backing paper material was very sloppily glued on and has a wrinkled appearance on all four panels. The other screen I purchased was glued properly and the paper is nice and flat and neat looking. I do like the basic design of this, but am pretty disappointed because it looks sloppy and cheap because of the paper. The paper looks yellow in my photo because of lighting, it is white.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025

Amazon Customer

West Palm Beach, US

★★★★★ 5

Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage

Size: 3 Panel 12FT W

I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well. Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely. One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs. The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers. Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster. Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality. Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026